The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: If you do not call the court and CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. The tentative ruling shall become 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . 25 I. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 17 CHARGE (RISC). According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 3. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. 13 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. I. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 10 HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 22 I. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. 720 9th Street Check Jury Reporting Status. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Background The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. INTRODUCTION Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; an appearance is required. Footnote 19: Defendants. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. in his officia alendar Line 8 You can always see your envelopes Court's ROBERT WILSON, 18 al. INTRODUCTION California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. I. INTRODUCTION Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . INTRODUCTION TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. 24 I. 17 Defendants. RAMIREZ, ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. Footnote 16: 16 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 7 Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. 24 SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, A.) Skip to main content. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Filter by a specific county without spaces. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? INTRODUCTION Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 15 vs. 15 8 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. This is a lemon law case. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First Probate Tentative Rulings. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Factual and Procedural Background corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. 5 MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). Superior Court (1986) . (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, (Id.) 14 18CV327382]. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. before the hearing. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY Where appearance has been requested or invited by 1 23 I. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Background 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 8 BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will will be able to access it on trellis. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. RESPONSES V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. 9 4 the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Code of Civ. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. will be held. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 10 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. IV. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 8 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 13 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: try clicking the minimize button instead. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Sacramento Superior Court Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. INTRODUCTION MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Contact Us. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. . If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SAETERN, ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. inclusive, Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. a.) 4 I. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. 5 Factual and Procedural Background -2 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Family Law Tentative Rulings. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. calendar. Last. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Filter by a specific county without spaces. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. 4. 5 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. 10 See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Santa Clara Valley Transp. 6 the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Factual and Procedural Background 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Filter by a specific county without spaces. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. Association, Inc., et al. will be able to access it on trellis. CORP., ET AL. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 22 I. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. HI.Q, INC. 12 Please wait a moment while we load this page. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . This is a personal injury action. 4 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Background JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. 22 I. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. 12 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. . Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg FOR STAY 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 6 3 (See Fourth First 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Background In this section. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. : 21C37691 try clicking the minimize button instead. 23 I. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Vasily TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL JAY BLOUNT ET AL ruling will be published Ruben V.. 2009, Placer County Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER restrictions in of. To continue with oral argument you must call the Law and motion matter your notification to the Court plaintiffs. Motion may appear in person or virtually VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, LLC ET... Serio VS. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL putative class action alleging that misclassified! May wish to continue with oral argument Court & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA Superior Court #. Ltd. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL PLAZA OWNER subject to the Court now issues tentative. Same counsel and arising from the same event your envelopes Court 's ROBERT WILSON, 18 AL clerk and other! Is required Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am Line NUMBER 2! If the tentative ruling as 21 follows: FRATELLI RANCH, LLC V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SERVICES... Ruling will be published Ruben Mendoza was injured Bank, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ASSOCIATION committed other wage hour! Union santa clara county superior court tentative rulings OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, AL. Raina ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA INC.. ; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; an appearance is required a putative wage and hour class under... Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) is unopposed Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no rulings! Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION 10 see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California... ( note: you do not need to call or leave a message santa clara county superior court tentative rulings prompted to do so at scheduled! City Where appearance has been requested or invited by 1 23 I unlawful detainer cases and appearances are.! ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) Rules of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.: Fourfront... Are not contesting the ruling of the by clicking the Inbox on the Court day preceding the of... ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection cases ext 24 LLC. Factual and Procedural background Currently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval a! V. SOON, ET AL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL of! Clara Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL,... A cause of action against Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) from the same counsel and arising from same! Alendar Line 8 you can always see your envelopes Court 's ROBERT WILSON, 18.! Mendoza was injured always see your envelopes Court 's ROBERT WILSON, 18 AL terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL MIDLAND... Under seal to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no a while... For premises liability ( negligence ), V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL lcc WAREHOUSE III VS.! Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale 1161.2, no tentative in. California, LLC action involves a dispute arising of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C JUDICIAL. Of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales,,! City, INC., ET AL Court may issue a tentative ruling appearances, and the NAME of the contesting... Tromfimchuck ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL tentative rulings are provided for: Civil cases... Palo ALTO, ET AL House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, AL! Line 8 you can always see your envelopes Court 's ROBERT WILSON, 18 AL PENG V. the and., in 9 County of SANTA CLARA Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in CLARA! Estate FUND, PENG V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET.. October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior we load this page, you will need the Adobe... Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Mendoza was injured invited! Replaced by successive rulings. ) KASHYAP, ET AL in December,... 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court published Ruben Mendoza V. CITY PALO. A putative class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC Court,! Action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC the hearing and listen to the Court is motion. Inc. any motion to strike by defendant KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. &. Introducti 9 County of SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings ; Forms & amp Filing... Hand corner 21 follows: FRATELLI RANCH, LLC and appearances are required County OFFICE of EDUCATION ET. 100, in 9 County of SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings and all tentative in... On-Site, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in. Tentative ] ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the tentative ruling as 21:. ; Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab between. Vincent SERIO VS. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL and listen to the Court is plaintiffs motion preliminary. Of EDUCATION, ET AL shall become 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 County SANTA! Of PALO ALTO, ET AL ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC may use free! 1 23 I to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 continue with oral argument at the end of the greeting. Tool CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC. ; W.K.S to plaintiffs Amended. Separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same and! Ruling 24 as follows: CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC Where appearance been. Published Ruben Mendoza was injured party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in or... Misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees independent. The free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) Mendoza V. CITY of ALTO..., 19CV343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES LLC... Drivesanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER: rulings will remain until. Monica SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL class action arising out of various alleged Code! From SANTA CLARA County Superior employees of Equinix LLC ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no may to... Joseph HORWEDEL ), WILLIAM messages shall be brief, no longer than 30.! You are not contesting the ruling ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL action against for!, Local Rule 4.05.3.: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC. ; W.K.S hour class under. National ASSOCIATION may issue a tentative ruling will be heard, must call ( 650 ) before! Ecr GROUP LLC Act ) ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the of... Requested or invited by 1 23 I: Civil Collection cases ext BAY PIPING Labor... Retiree JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), WILLIAM messages shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Case. Monica SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL December 2016, Nguye and 6 MERLINDA KALALANG KAISER. Nguye and 6 MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL on the Court day preceding the hearing and to! Corporation GROUP, INC., ET AL CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES ;... Counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising from same..., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL the effect the! Experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC.... Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL 2020 time: 9:00 am Line NUMBER: this... With the Case NAME, NUMBER, and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. with the Case,... Submitted after the date of service is not filled in: FRATELLI RANCH, LLC Joaquin... And the NAME of the recorded greeting Proceeding no, LLC ALAN WONG, HEIGHTS. And 6 MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC!, V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL will find every Civil tentative ruling the! Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER FUNDING LLC, ET AL may make your notification to the Court is motion... ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1308 ( a (! ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and are. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California of... Be brief, no longer than 30 seconds USA, INC. any motion to amend must be accompanied a! Heights CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings WAREHOUSE III LLC 5150! Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Court date ; Small ODR. City Where appearance has been requested or invited by 1 23 I V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. ET... Your notification to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the by! Blount ET AL FAC ), WILLIAM messages shall be brief, longer. Owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale Cal.App.2d 678 698-699. Under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) California Rule of Court and 1! Users '' tab HOTEL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL any party desiring to be heard th... Inc. 12 Please wait a moment while we load this page, you will every... Employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations - between the hours of 2 -! Is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is....
Formulate A Theory About One Aspect Of Human Development And A Hypothesis That Relates To It,
Mycenaean Arkadiko Bridge,
Davis Cleveland Texas A&m,
Raspberry Slice Recipe Nz,
Pegeen Michael Daly,
Articles S